| |
In
June 908 the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) released its
Statement of Basis and Purpose and
Final Discretionary Rule (“final
Rule”) on the
CAN-SPAM ACT. This statement
contains four new rules, and also
contains some clarifications and
guidance to the text of the original
act in the form of the Statement of
Basis and Purpose (SBP). You can
read the
FTC press release, and you can
find the full text of the update
here. The new rules go into
effect on July 7th 2008.
While we cannot provide legal
advice, we feel it is important to
provide you with our interpretation
of how the federal law may affect
you. This article covers the
highlights of the FTC update, and is
not a full analysis of how it may
apply to you. If you believe you may
be affected, you should consult with
your own attorney. Note also that
since the rules are new, it’s likely
that the interpretations will evolve
over time as the industry acquires
more experience with
implementations.Highlights
If you are adhering to your
current terms and conditions, making
sure that your messages contain a
valid company name and physical
address, and are not working with
affiliates or 3rd party advertisers,
there are probably only two
things you need to look at:
- First, you should review the
From: address and From: name you
are using in your emails. At
least one and preferably both of
these should be clearly
recognizable as belonging to
your organization.
- Second, make sure
you are not “procuring” the
forwarding of your campaigns by
offering any kind of incentive (
e.g. coupons, discounts,
t-shirts, etc.) to your
recipients. Forwarded messages
that contain incentives to
forward will be non-compliant
under CAN-SPAM because they will
be considered commercial
messages and will not contain
the required opt-out mechanism.
However, as each situation is
unique, we encourage you to read on
to verify that none of the other
updates apply to you.
Four new rules were added:
Four new rules
were added:
- There were some
modifications to the definition
of “sender” in order to clarify
the required CAN-SPAM compliance
when there are multiple
advertisers in a single message.
In general, it clarifies that
the From: address
visible to your recipients
should be clearly recognizable
as belonging to your
organization. In
addition, if you work with
affiliates or you have 3rd party
advertisements in your email
campaigns you should review the
new rule provisions relating to
the definition of sender as it
relates to multi-sender emails.
- The opt-out
mechanism must not be
complicated: “an e-mail
recipient cannot be required to
pay a fee, provide information
other than his or her e-mail
address and opt-out preferences,
or take any steps other than
sending a reply e-mail message
or visiting a single Internet
Web page to opt out of receiving
future e-mail from a sender”.
(The Steve's Partner Stores & Info Center
opt-out mechanism is compliant
with the new guidelines.)
- Commercial mailers
may now use a valid
P. O. box
as the required physical postal
address in their messages, as
long as it is valid and meets
USPS registration guidelines.
- The term “person” has been
defined as “an individual,
group, unincorporated
association, limited or general
partnership, corporation, or
other business entity.” This is
intended to clarify that
CAN-SPAM’s obligations are not
limited to natural persons.
If you are a single organization
sending email on your own behalf and
do not publish ads from third
parties in your emails, then the new
rules will likely have little impact
on you unless your opt-outs do not
comply with the new stricter opt-out
guidelines. If you work with a third
party (i.e. Constant Contact) that
manages your opt-outs for you, you
should consult with them to make
sure that their mechanism will
comply with the new rule provisions
by the July 7th deadline. Constant
Contact's Rules do comply.
Additional FTC Guidance:
The Final Rule also provides some
additional guidance, the Statement
of Basis and Purpose, on aspects of
the Act that it does not explicitly
modify in the final rule. Although
these items are not officially
mandated, they give guidance on how
the FTC is likely to interpret
applicability and compliance, and in
that context should be given careful
consideration.
- The FTC clarifies that
forward-to-a-friend
mechanisms, which have generally
been treated as exempt from
CAN-SPAM because they are 1-to-1
messages from the original
recipient to their friend,
may in fact be subject
to CAN-SPAM if the originator of
the message “procures” the
forwarding or if the
forwarded message is stored in
any way by the forwarding
system.
-
- A message has been
“procured” if “the seller
offers money, coupons,
discounts, awards,
additional entries in a
sweepstakes, or the like in
exchange for forwarding a
message”.
- Because most
forward-to-a-friend
mechanisms are not set up to
include opt-out links that
would make the message
CAN-SPAM compliant and
enable the final recipient
to opt-out of future
messages from the original
sender, this means that
any forwarded
message whose forwarding has
been “procured” would make
the original sender
non-compliant under CAN-SPAM.
- To ensure you’re
not caught by this
clarification, you should
make sure that you’re not
offering any incentives in
the content of your email
campaigns that encourages
your recipients to forward
them. For example,
“forward to 10 friends and
get a 10% off coupon”, or
“get a free t-shirt” would
likely classify your
forwarded message as
commercial and thus subject
to CAN-SPAM.
- There is fairly extensive
guidance given on the definition
of a “transactional or
relationship message”. The FTC
decided not to exempt entire
classes of messages from
CAN-SPAM, but rather requires
they be considered on “a
case-by-case basis depending on
the specific content and context
of such messages”. If all of
your communications to your
recipients are already CAN-SPAM
compliant, you don’t need to
worry about these
clarifications; if you do treat
some of your communication as
transactional you probably want
to look at this section in more
detail to ensure that you’re not
impacted by the clarifications.
- The FTC has decided not to
alter the time limit (10 days)
for honoring an opt-out request;
in addition, it reaffirms that
there is no time-out on
an opt-out request,
i.e. that it may only be
over-ridden by a subsequent
explicit opt-in request.
|